By Jonathan Stempel
Aug 25 (Reuters) - Federal prosecutors on Friday opposed a
last-ditch effort by New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez to allow
periodic delays in his federal corruption trial in Newark, New
Jersey, next month so that he can travel to Washington to cast
critical Senate votes.
U.S. District Judge William Walls on Tuesday had rejected
Menendez's request, saying the Democrat was free to "absent
himself" from testimony but did not deserve special treatment,
being "no worse and no better than any other defendant."
In a filing on Thursday, Menendez said his "constitutional
obligations" to his constituents justified altering the trial
schedule so he could vote on raising the debt ceiling to avoid a
government shutdown, rewriting the tax code and renewing the
soon-to-expire National Flood Insurance Program.
Republicans have a narrow Senate majority, and Menendez said
July's failed effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act showed
his absence from any vote could be "potentially determinative."
The trial is scheduled to begin on Sept. 6.
Prosecutors on Friday said the scheduling conflicts resulted
from Menendez's lengthy, failed pursuit of a meritless argument
that the Constitution immunized him from prosecution.
"No defendant should receive special treatment based on
power or privilege," prosecutors said. "This court should reject
defendant Menendez's effort to let politics in Washington
dictate the trial schedule in Newark."
Menendez later countered that U.S. Supreme Court precedents
and "common sense" justified an accommodation.
It is unclear when the judge will rule on Menendez's
request.
The senator was charged with accepting campaign donations
and gifts, including a stay at a Caribbean villa and private jet
flights, from co-defendant Salomon Melgen in exchange for
lobbying on the Florida eye doctor's behalf.
Both men have pleaded not guilty to fraud and bribery. Jury
selection was completed on Wednesday.
If Menendez were found guilty and removed from the Senate
before New Jersey Governor Chris Christie completes his term on
Jan. 16, 2018, then Christie, a Republican, could name a
replacement. Christie's successor could fill any subsequent
vacancy.
The case is U.S. v. Menendez et al, U.S. District Court,
District of New Jersey, No. 15-cr-00155.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Dan
Grebler)
© 2025 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.