Many of the public perceptions on the resistance to immigration period and illegal immigration specifically is couched in terms of us and them not the “global we” that many promoting a New World Order of open borders and population control would like to see.
A big threat to each nation's sovereignty is the point that everyone has a right to migrate wherever they like without assimilation into the home nations where they want to go. Those espousing such like the U.N. occasionally does, are not in the neighborhoods likely to be affected nor recipient of the benefits being given to the new immigrants.
The U.S. system of legal immigration is fraught with racism based on nations of origin with the European nations granted more favor than Asian, then African and then those of the darker islands such as Haiti, Jamaica, and Bermuda. Such disparities are often based on talent pools, worker assessments, religious similarities, etc. Europe’s current immigrant dilemmas in large measure reflects a dropping citizen population which necessitated importing workers.
The problem arose when dissimilar cultures, particularly religious beliefs were involved and the immigrant population’s reproduction rate threatened to surpass the existing cultures. Such dynamics are a foreboding of civil disturbances with no easy solutions. Such can lead to cultural destruction.
It is right to protect the borders not just from people illegally seeking entry but as a checkpoint to those bringing diseases into the nation such as atypical TB which could wipeout areas where that disease is endemic. Both Presidents Truman and Eisenhower deported over 20 million immigrants to preserve citizen jobs, so don’t say it can’t be done.
The Obama administration's effort to end the wet/dry policy is to be applauded, but why did they wait until his last week in office? The Obama administration's policy that allowed illegal immigrants to get jobs and be paid more than citizens with accompanying housing and medical benefits, was and is wrong disadvantaging citizens again.
Why weren’t Native Americans given that option especially given their sovereign rights to negotiate with the U.S. government? Bills put forth to grant higher education to illegal immigrant children may sound compassionate but that same measure is disparate in its impact on poor people and those of color’s children who are citizens not given the same.
Our system of illegal immigration acceptance is not based on political asylum which would theoretically grant Haitians a pass or allow refugees shelter, but flaunts economic opportunity for those who can walk across our borders no matter the potential displacement of U.S. workers.
The influx of drugs and gang activity increases along these porous seams as our feckless populations bent on self-pleasure at the hands of their own personal destruction develop an insatiable appetite for drugs. Illegal populations and those operating in our under culture are witnessing an increase enrollment devaluing human life. An opportunity to make a fast buck at the expense of citizens who need these same opportunities decrease is an unacceptable morality now being espoused.
The sad fact is that there are jobs which many citizens could do but don’t want thinking the work is beneath them. The auto companies and others may be bringing back jobs, but don’t be deceived, robotics and AI (artificial intelligence) will soon likely wipe out the need for humans in these fields at the level where many find themselves unemployed. Higher education fails in continuing to educate with a future focus.
The reality is the service sector is one of the few sites for jobs. I was flabbergasted to see an automatic flagman at a street construction site. Where are folks to find work? The state and federal government ought to be required to hire citizens rather than outsource social security and Medicare query lines or toll roads. MSN and internet companies might take a similar hint as should the Donald Trump line of ties made overseas. All should be invested in finding new sources of employment for this nation.
Dr. Ada M. Fisher was the first black woman to serve as the Republican National Committeewoman. She was a candidate for the U.S. Senate from North Carolina, a candidate for U.S. Congress, and a candidate for the North Carolina House of Representatives. She is the author of "Common Sense Conservative Prescriptions Solutions for What Ails Us, Book I." For more of her reports, Go Here Now.
© 2023 Newsmax. All rights reserved.