Skip to main content
Tags: rubio | obama | legislation | devastating

Rubio: Obama Admin.'s Sweeping Regulations 'Devastating'

By    |   Tuesday, 12 March 2013 06:46 PM EDT

Sen. Marco Rubio tells Newsmax he is introducing two bills to gauge the impact of sweeping regulations proposed by the Obama administration, calling some of them “really devastating.”

The Florida Republican also says he is confident that the Rep. Paul Ryan budget plan will be a good starting point toward fiscal responsibility.

In an exclusive interview with Newsmax TV, Sen. Rubio discusses the two bills he is introducing on Tuesday.

Story continues below.



“My biggest concern is the hidden cost of regulations on the economy in general,” he says. “Regulation is costly and in addition it’s a barrier to entry, especially for small businesses. So the two bills do two different things.

“The Regulatory Cost to Small Business Act is going to require the Small Business Administration to do an annual study to determine the total cost of federal regulations to small businesses and the American economy. And the Regulation Cost to America requires them to specifically determine the impact that it has to the general economy.”

Latest: Should ObamaCare Be Repealed? Vote in Urgent National Poll

Former General Electric CEO Jack Welch has said the cost of regulation, excluding Obamacare, is nearly four times that of Bill Clinton’s first term and five times that of George W. Bush’s first term. Asked if that is a fair assessment or if the cost is even higher, Rubio responds: “It’s probably higher. That’s why we want to have these studies, so we can know for sure.

“The only way we’re going to create the kind of middle class prosperity that Americans want and are used to in this new world that’s about globalism — and unfortunately, a lot of jobs have been lost because of that — is to make America a friendly place to create jobs, and regulations comes into play when it comes to that.

“As we’re competing with other countries for these jobs to be created here, one of the things that companies look at is how much does it cost, from a regulatory standpoint. So before we can even have a serious debate about regulations, let’s know what the costs are. And I just don’t understand why anybody would be against this idea.”

Rubio says he is concerned that the administration will seek to impose a flurry of regulations in Obama’s second term.

“I am concerned about that and they’ve certainly shown an implication that if they can’t get things passed through Congress to try to do it by executive action or executive order or regulatory framework. You’ve certainly seen it in the environmental realm. In fact, some of the things they’re threatening now on energy policy would be really devastating.

“What I am offering is basically this: Let’s do a study on the impact of regulations on small business. Before you do any new regulations, shouldn’t we know that the ones we’re doing now cost?”

As to what opponents can do if Obama tries to use executive orders to push his agenda, Rubio observes:

“First, people can take him to court, and we would hope the judiciary would be on our side on some of these because they’re just overreaches.

“Second, we can take this away from him in essence by passing laws that specifically prohibit him from doing these things, or replace whatever it is he’s done through legislation. What’s made it difficult to do that, of course, is his allies in the Senate, the Democratic majority in the Senate, that were blocking the efforts to do that. But we are never going to become the kind of economy that the middle class needs if we are out-regulating ourselves from the market place.”

House Republicans are unveiling Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget plan, which would balance the budget in 10 years with reforms to Medicare and slow down the increase of annual spending.

Rubio comments: “First of all, I haven’t seen the details of it, only what I’ve read. But let me just say, in general, I’ve found Paul Ryan to be a serious policymaker. I’ve read, for example, that it defunds Obamacare, and that’s positive. I’ve read that it doesn’t raise taxes, and that’s good. I’ve read that it balances in a decade, and that’s good.

“And it even balances quicker, in my opinion, if you look at the impacts this could have on economic growth. So those are good starting points.

“I may have some suggestions about ways we should change it. But I certainly trust the budget he’s proposing much more than I’m going to trust the budget that [Sen.] Patty Murray and the Democrats are going to propose here in a couple of days.”

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has come out with a new book, “Immigration Wars,” in which he outlines his immigration plan. He differentiates between a pathway to citizenship and legal status and favors a path to residency over citizenship.

Rubio, who has also proposed an immigration plan, comments: “First of all, there’s no such thing as a path to citizenship. You can’t go from being illegally here, or even legally here, to being a citizen. There’s a path to a green card to a path to residency.

“We’re trying to talk about now, number one, what you do with the people that are illegally in this country today who are not criminals, who can pay back taxes and fines? What status do you give them? And, number two, do you eventually allow them to apply for – not be awarded – a green card.

“The fundamental question is once they do get a green card, be it 10, 15, 20 years down the road, will they be only Americans with green cards? Will they be the only people in America with a green card that will not be allowed to ever apply for citizenship?

Latest: Should ObamaCare Be Repealed? Vote in Urgent National Poll

“I thought about that a lot and I ultimately concluded it is not a good idea to have millions of people in this country who have green cards but can never apply for citizenship, even if it’s many, many years down the road.

“As Gov. Bush has stated in the aftermath of the release of his book, that’s something he would open to if it could be done responsibly. And that’s my position as well.”

Rubio was also asked about the possibility he and Jeb Bush could be on the GOP presidential ticket in 2016.

“Gov. Bush’s answer this weekend is exactly where I am, which is these are issues that are down the road at some point.

“We have jobs to do. Obviously, Jeb has his own involvement in the private sector. I’m a U.S. senator from Florida, that’s my fulltime job and that’s what I’m focused on. Obviously, at some point, I’ll have to make a decision about my future, whether it’s to run for re-election or run for something else or go back to the private world and allow someone else a chance to serve. It’s not time to make that decision yet.

“And when that time comes, I’ll make that decision based on what’s best for family and myself and what I think is best for the country.”

© 2024 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Newsfront
Sen. Marco Rubio tells Newsmax he is introducing two bills to gauge the impact of sweeping regulations proposed by the Obama administration, calling some of them really devastating.
rubio,obama,legislation,devastating
1195
2013-46-12
Tuesday, 12 March 2013 06:46 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
Get the NewsmaxTV App for iOS Get the NewsmaxTV App for Android Scan QR code to get the NewsmaxTV App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved