Skip to main content
Tags: bragg | charges

Could a Manhattan Jury Acquit Trump?

presidency trial court system press

Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media at his trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments, at Manhattan Criminal Court on May 14, 2024 in New York City. Former U.S.  (Curtis Means - Pool/Getty Images)

Deroy Murdock By Wednesday, 15 May 2024 05:03 PM EDT Current | Bio | Archive

Having served on three Manhattan juries, I would not be surprised if the 12 men and women hearing New York vs. Donald J. Trump acquit him of all charges.

During two civil actions and one criminal case, my fellow jurors were serious, professional, and movingly civic-minded.

A quiet, solemn patriotism infused our deliberations.

Several jurors said that we should respect the justice system because, someday, we might need it to respect us.

•My first case was a medical-malpractice lawsuit involving a botched abortion. We empathized with a woman wounded by her doctors, but her lawyer did not prove negligence. So, we backed her physicians.

"But we’ve got to give her something," one juror insisted.

Others instantly rebuked him.

"That’s not how it works!" one said.

"I feel sorry for her, too," another admitted. "But her lawyer never made her case."

So, we sent the plaintiff home without a penny.

•Next, we deliberated intensely for almost three days before concluding that a Harlem drug counselor never demonstrated his defamation-of-character claim against his employers.

My sympathetic pleas went unheeded, and he left empty handed.

•Finally, in her closing argument, a criminal prosecutor displayed a CD-ROM of a police dispatcher’s "Be on the lookout" announcement following an armed robbery.

When we asked the judge to play that recording, he told us that it was not in evidence.

Disgusted by this prosecutorial deception, we instantly and angrily acquitted the defendants. Minutes later, as foreman, I proudly announced our verdict in court.

These three cases confirm that Manhattan juries are sober and perfectly capable of fairness.

This is good news for Trump.

A jury of level-headed Manhattanites would appreciate these facts that verify the profound vacuity and fundamental unfairness of District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s "case" against Trump:

•An April 25, 2023 US Justice Department Memorandum of Understanding with the Federal Election Commission leaves Bragg powerless to prosecute this matter. "The Department has exclusive jurisdiction over criminal enforcement of the federal campaign finance laws,” the memorandum states.

"The Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over civil enforcement," the memo also says. Nowhere does this federal rule grant local prosecutors authority to enforce federal election laws. Thus, Bragg’s case is a shack built atop a cloud of helium.

•Bragg indicted Trump on April 4, 2023, four months after the statute of limitations expired on the corresponding Class E felonies.

•Bragg skirted the statute of limitations by claiming that Trump falsified business records to commit a second violation.

After three weeks of this trial, that second crime remains a mystery.

•Prosecutors described a "catch-and-kill scheme" through which the National Enquirer bought the rights to stories that might embarrass Trump and then buried them.

Rather than a plot to influence the 2016 election, the Enquirer routinely caught and killed stories about Trump and other newsmakers including Rahm Emanuel, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mark Wahlberg, and Tiger Woods.

More importantly, "catch and kill" might be dodgy, but it's not illegal.

•Former nude thespian Stormy Daniels signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) promising quietude about consensual sex that Trump and, at various times, Daniels herself deny ever sharing.

NDAs are perfectly legal. I have signed at least three (while dressed), and non-disclosure language has appeared in numerous contracts I have endorsed.

Confidential out-of-court settlements operate similarly and legally.

•Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen paid Daniels to clam up about her alleged intimacy with Trump. Again, sex or no sex, it is legal to pay people to ignore journalists (although buying silence before law enforcement is obstruction of justice).

•Trump’s checks allegedly reimbursed Cohen for payments to Daniels.

It is perfectly legal for a client to repay his attorney funds advanced in a lawful transaction.

•Bragg claims that Trump should have paid for this private matter with campaign cash.

That would have been illegal. Instead, Trump legally used his own money.

•Trump faces 34 counts of alleged falsification of business records because his bookkeepers posted ledger entries for checks to Cohen as "legal expenses."

Would Bragg prefer false descriptions like "plumbing supplies" or "marble tiles?"

Trump faces prison for reporting legal expenses as "legal expenses," which is legal.

With 48% of registered voters telling Reuters-Ipsos last month that Trump’s Kafkaesque cases are "excessive and politically motivated" (41% disagree) even a Manhattan jury could scrap Bragg’s contraption.

My memories of jury duty, including within the Stalinesque building in which Trump is being persecuted, tell me that deliberating jurors could think, "I won’t vote for Trump. But I cannot convict him beyond a reasonable doubt in a shaky case about actions that are lurid, but legal."

If just one juror agrees, this case will end with a hung jury.

A second trial would be unlikely before Election Day.

And if "lurid, but legal" reflects the opinions of 12 of my fellow Manhattanites --- who tend to be tough, but fair — then President Donald J. Trump will be acquitted on all charges and go back where he belongs — the campaign trail.

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News Contributor. Read Deroy Murdock's Reports — Read More Here.

© 2024 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

if "lurid, but legal" reflects the opinions of 12 of my fellow Manhattanites, who tend to be tough, but fair, then President Donald J. Trump will be acquitted on all charges and go back where he belongs, the campaign trail.
bragg, charges
Wednesday, 15 May 2024 05:03 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
Get the NewsmaxTV App for iOS Get the NewsmaxTV App for Android Scan QR code to get the NewsmaxTV App
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved