×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - In Google Play
VIEW
×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - On the App Store
VIEW
Skip to main content
Tags: Sequester | budget | cuts | spending

Bring on the Sequester

By    |   Friday, 22 February 2013 09:49 AM EST

Of course, just like the "fiscal cliff" we never jumped off of, the nation will likely never see the so-called "sequester" or "automatic sequential budget cuts" that were agreed to by President Obama and Congress in the fall of 2011 come to fruition in March.
 
That's because the president, the politicians, and the media will work the public and Wall Street into a frenzy, and we will have another of our national panic attacks leading to an 11th-hour compromise. And of course that compromise will be some short-term patch that serves as another Band-Aid, while our debt situation gets further out of control.
 
But consider what happens if the automatic cuts actually do take place. According to Jamie Dupree, a reliable and veteran reporter on Capitol Hill, the sequester is not just a reduction in the rate of spending. He reports that the cuts would result in an actual baseline reduction in the federal budget for FY 2013.
 
And while the amount of actual reduction might seem a drop in the bucket, it would be the first drop needed to start the flow of government funds moving in the right direction.
 
Of course, with Republican "inside the Beltway" experts convincing GOP lawmakers that the public will blame the GOP for the alleged economic meltdown we will incur from actually allowing the automatic cuts to take place, Republican leaders have started to exclaim that the very cuts they determined necessary in order to restore the nation's creditworthiness in 2011 are now no longer acceptable.
 
The Democrats, who controlled the Senate and passed the legislation, decry these cuts as well now that they are around the corner.
 
And don't forget President Obama. Dupree, who is completely nonpartisan, pointed out in his own blog that the legislation "was evidently his idea," along with that of the aforementioned parties in Congress. But now, as the tough medicine (which is really just a droplet) is about to be administered, the very cuts passed into law are creating another "crisis" that many argue will put us in another recession.
 
As noted before, for a lot of us the recession has never ended. And don't be fooled by those roaring good times on Wall Street. A little-known fact is that the Federal Reserve's endless effort at pumping liquidity into the market has included endless purchase of equities. It's easy to be on a high when oxygen is being pumped into a room. But just like might be the case in a casino or two, the high enjoyed while the oxygen is flowing goes away when the money is lost and the true light of day is confronted.
 
And don't be fooled as to true motives of the various parties in Washington. The biggest cuts in the sequester are to the military, and no one really believes that President Obama is upset over that. It's just that having the "bad Republicans" to blame for the various reductions and their impact is simply irresistible to Obama and his Democratic colleagues.
 
As for the Republicans, not only are many of them scared of their own shadow, but they are beholden to defense-related industries that have funded their political careers for years. It all sounded fine to pass this thing back in late 2011, but when it became clear that their tough action included dipping into some rather sacred wells, that created quite a different set of circumstances.
 
So now with just over a week to go, everyone in Washington is waiting for the doomsday stories to start running in papers and television news programs that not only spell out the human tragedy of those who will suffer as a result of real cutbacks, but also the dire economic impact that sequestration will cause.
 
Then there will be the obligatory plunge in the stock market. The cable news networks will start their countdown clocks — 120 hours and 12 seconds until sequestration . . . and the end of time. It's all so predictable.
 
Why don't we just let one of these things really hit the fan? The Republicans might just find that not everyone blames them. The president might be forced to actually negotiate with a Republican House that has the upper hand. And we might finally see what all the politicians say they want — a real live reduction in spending — even if it's just a drop in the bucket.
 
Matt Towery is author of the book "Paranoid Nation: The Real Story of the 2008 Fight for the Presidency." He heads the polling and political information firm InsiderAdvantage. Read more reports from Matt Towery — Click Here Now.
 


 
 

 
 

© Creators Syndicate Inc.


MattTowery
Of course, just like the "fiscal cliff" we never jumped off of, the nation will likely never see the so-called "sequester" or "automatic sequential budget cuts" that were agreed to by President Obama and Congress in the fall of 2011 come to fruition in March.
Sequester,budget,cuts,spending
767
2013-49-22
Friday, 22 February 2013 09:49 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
Get the NewsmaxTV App for iOS Get the NewsmaxTV App for Android Scan QR code to get the NewsmaxTV App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved