Think of it as a bank heist, one in which armed robbers crash through the front doors and hightail it to different sections of the building.
One approaches a teller and shoves a gun in his face.
One sneaks over to the main computer and hacks away. Another goes into the vault and locks it behind him, so he can swap out real hundies with counterfeit ones when no one is looking.
That pretty much sums up what the Democrats did, election-style.
The 2020 presidential election was stolen out from under the American people.
And the crooks used a number of means to bring their devious plan to fruition.
Evidence of fraud is there for anyone to see, but the corporate media seem to be engaging in one of three strategies: stating that none exists; ignoring it altogether; or subjecting it to a "fact-checking" process.
The evidence this election-go-round is massive.
Additionally, the evidence is credible enough to warrant an overturn of the results in the battleground states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada.
The above statements are accurate, even when the staggering amount of statistical evidence and the mounting data involving tabulation machines and software are not taken into account.
Contrary to what has been reported, this election did not produce the largest vote tally in American history. Rather, it produced the largest ballot tally in American history.
Shockingly, there were ballots that were deliberately destroyed and others that were intentionally separated from their counterpart envelopes.
Then there were those ballots that were scanned multiple times, "cured" prior to the date they were set to be opened, lost in predominantly Trump precincts, and even received before having been sent out.
While those tasked with the job of observing were prevented from carrying out their viewing responsibilities, others were busy voting multiple times. Even dead people got into the act, evidently casting ballots from the world beyond.
There are now hundreds of affidavits, videos, and statements that set forth various forms of wrongful behavior that took place in the election tabulation process.
Numerous election workers and postal employees have come forward to sign sworn statements under penalty of perjury that they were specifically instructed to backdate otherwise ineligible ballots.
In several states, observers signed sworn statements under penalty of perjury that they were blocked from seeing the vote counting.
Individuals in multiple states have also signed sworn statements under penalty of perjury regarding signatures that failed to match, optical scanners that were set to accept unverified ballots, and voter ID laws that were circumvented.
As America looked on with mouths agape, battleground states announced that the counting had been put to a halt.
Then, despite what had been said, in the wee hours of the morning when most people were asleep, dumps of hundreds of thousands of ballots took place, with most producing a disproportionate count for the Democratic presidential candidate.
In a simultaneous occurrence, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia each pretended to stop ballot counting.
But secretly they continued to count.
In Georgia, officials put a stop to the election night counting under the guise that the premises had to be cleared out due to a water pipe burst.
This turned out to be a lie.
A surveillance video shows election workers actually dismissing observers.
After all observers had left the premises, four cases of ballots were pulled out from underneath a table, and large piles of ballots began to be tallied.
Sharyl Attkisson, one of the few journalist professionals that still exists, reported that President Trump was leading in Georgia by more than 100,000 votes on election eve.
But after 16 vote dumps that took place over a six-hour period, his Democrat opponent was able to take the lead in a "statistically improbable" manner.
President Trump was comfortably in the lead in Wisconsin on election night until a gigantic dump of ballots took place. Five% of the state’s total, i.e., 170,000 votes, came in all at once.
In the blink of an eye, the Democrat contender took a small lead.
Similar statistically impossible numbers of late-arriving ballots came in to other swing states after a fake stoppage of the counting. These also brought in just the right number of votes to give the Democrat challenger a slim lead.
In President Trump’s Georgia lawsuit, allegations document more than 300,000 illegal absentee voters who applied for absentee ballots prior to the legal date and were improperly counted, illegal votes from more than 66,000 underage residents, approximately 40,000 who moved without re-registering, almost 16,000 who moved out of state prior to the election, close to 5,000 out-of-state registrants, over 2,600 late-arriving absentee voters, more than 2,500 felons, over 2,400 unregistered voters, and almost 400 people who voted in two states. Additionally, please click here to read about the overturninfg of President Trump's Georgia lawsuit.
Other glaring swing state improprieties include the following:
—In Michigan, election workers were directed to backdate tens of thousands of absentee ballots. Ballots for the Democratic nominee were scanned multiple times. And fake birthdates of non-registered voters were manually entered as a means of overriding the system and allowing their votes.
—In Pennsylvania, a subcontractor for the U.S. Postal Service stated that he was towing a trailer with 144,000-288,000 ballots that were being shipped from New York to Pennsylvania. After the subcontractor had completed his delivery, the trailer mysteriously disappeared from its parked location.
—In Wisconsin, a subcontractor for the U.S. Postal Service stated that he was told the postal service planned to backdate potentially tens of thousands of ballots.
When it comes to the courts, the Trump legal team has one of the lowest burdens of proof that exists in the law.
Unlike in a criminal case, the evidence in civil lawsuits such as these does not need to convince the court "beyond a reasonable doubt" that there were election improprieties. Rather, a "preponderance of the evidence" will suffice as proof.
This evidentiary level is sometimes described as that sufficient to show it was "more likely than not" that the fraud had taken place.
Will the courts and/or the state legislatures make the right decisions to have justice prevail?
America prays that they do.
James Hirsen, J.D., M.A., in media psycholodgy, is a New York Times best-selling author, media analyst, and law professor. Visit Newsmax TV Hollywood. Read James Hirsen's Reports — More Here.
© 2022 Newsmax. All rights reserved.