×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - In Google Play
VIEW
×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - On the App Store
VIEW
Skip to main content
Tags: jeffries | schumer

Soros Spends Millions on Democrats, 'Reform' Evaporates

george soros

George Soros addressed the assembly on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos on May 24, 2022. (Photo by Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images) 

Ira Stoll By Monday, 23 January 2023 03:05 PM EST Current | Bio | Archive

The largest donor in the 2020-2022 political cycle was a 92-year-old who spent more than $175 million, which is more than double the next-largest giver.

OpenSecrets.org, a nonpartisan website that tracks money in politics, says George Soros gave $178,710,771, of which $178,700,771 went to Democrats and $0 went to Republicans.

A search of the Federal Elections Commission database lists, by my count, $179,875,512.57 in contributions by Soros over the two-year period, after deducting those attributed to Alexander George Soros, a son of George Soros.

Whether it was $178 million or $179 million, it’s a lot of money, especially in an election where party control in the Senate and House was determined by narrow margins.

No wonder the Democratic push for "campaign finance reform" and to get "big money out of politics" has gone suddenly silent.

If a Republican donor like, say, the late Sheldon Adelson had spent that sort of money to buy Republican control of the Senate, you can bet the dollar amounts and the donor’s name would be all over the front pages of The Washington Post and The New York Times, with the editorial pages yammering on about the grave threat to democracy posed by plutocrats.

Aside from the abrupt disappearance of "campaign finance reform" from the Democratic political agenda, what else might the Soros phenomenon explain?

In a May 2022 appearance at the World Economic Forum at Davos, Soros said of Ukraine: "We must give them all the support that they ask for."

The U.S. has committed more than $24.9 billion in security assistance to Ukraine since the beginning of the Biden administration.

It’s certainly possible that a Democratic president and Congress would have provided that sort of support without Soros advocating for it, but the fact that the war in Ukraine is the number one priority of the party’s number one donor is the sort of thing where, again, if it were a Republican donor and a Republican president, the press would be all over.

Not that Soros has been afraid to clash publicly with President Biden on occasion.

He tweeted out opposition to "Biden’s plan to hire thousands of new police officers."

Alexander Soros, George Soros’s son, has a social media feed featuring photos of himself with Democratic congressional leaders such as Hakeem Jeffries and Charles Schumer. If it were a Republican megadonor’s son, the press would be full of complaints about "buying access."

With Soros, though, there’s a media blackout, with the exception of conservative outlets such as the Washington Examiner and Fox News Channel.

Absent is any investigative curiosity about how Soros’s political giving might intersect with his investment positions.

And the $178 million or $179 million sum is just federal political money; it doesn’t even count charitable giving channeled through the Open Society Foundations, some of which goes to organizations, such as J Street, the Tides Center, and the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, that advance policies and principles highly complementary to the political giving.

This writer's point isn’t that Soros should be prevented from participating in American politics or distributing charitable money. Far from it.

There may be issues, such as criminal justice reform or freedom in China, where he’s advancing worthwhile goals.

On issues where his influence is less constructive — or actually counterproductive — his opponents would be better off not trying to stifle him or constrain him with regulations.

Instead, they’d be better served by exposing his influence and by investing, at his scale, in competing ideas.

Conservative funders value thrift and bang-for-the-buck, and understandably so.

There has been, as well, a lot of talk, some of it overstated, about how low-dollar internet fundraising has made megadonors such as Soros less important. Money alone can’t buy an election outcome, as Michael Bloomberg and Tom Steyer found in 2020.

As the 2024 election cycle gets into swing, though, the news about Soros and 2022 is a reminder of the size of the investments that are being made in American politics.

Will another after-the-fact column be written in 2025 about how George Soros again bought Biden re-election to the White House and Democrats control of Congress?

Or will a Republican or two step up to counteract the Soros influence by investing at Soros scale?

(Editor's note: a related Newsmax article may be found here.)

Ira Stoll is the author of "Samuel Adams: A Life," and "JFK, Conservative." Read Ira Stoll's Reports — More Here.

© 2023 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Ira-Stoll
This writer's point isn’t that Soros should be prevented from participating in American politics or distributing charitable money. Far from it. There may be issues, such as criminal justice reform or freedom in China, where he’s advancing worthwhile goals.
jeffries, schumer
734
2023-05-23
Monday, 23 January 2023 03:05 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 
TOP

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved