×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - In Google Play
VIEW
×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - On the App Store
VIEW
Tags: invest | fed | rates | 2000

Mark Yusko: It's 2000 All Over Again

Mark Yusko: It's 2000 All Over Again
Then President Bill Clinton reviews the federal government's efforts to prepare its computer systems for the year 2000 and the Y2K bug during a speech at the National Academy of Sciences (Photo: AP)

John Mauldin By Monday, 13 June 2016 07:27 AM Current | Bio | Archive


At this year’s Strategic Investment Conference, my good friend Mark Yusko poured cold water on whatever bullishly warm feelings the most optimistic folks may have clung to.

You might think someone who manages real money would have a more enlightened view than those bearish economists. Mark, however, was hardly bullish. He listed 10 plausible scenarios that could send markets down to the basement.

Here I’ll focus on his “Surprise #6: Déjà vu, Welcome to #2000.2.0.”  That’s right: Mark says it’s year 2000 all over again. That was when the tech bubble popped and sent us to an ugly bear market and recession.

Here are four major parallels he pointed out that make it clear we are heading for another ugly recession — or are already in one without realizing it.

Parallel #1: The Fed’s urge to raise rates

One of the major catalysts for the recession was the Fed’s move to withdraw the liquidity it had pumped into the system for those who expected a payment system breakdown and thus hoarded physical cash.

Alan Greenspan took the fed funds rate from 5.4% on Y2K day to 6.5% in October 2000.

(Younger readers will do a double-take on those numbers. Yes, borrowing overnight money once cost more than 6%. Furthermore, the Fed is perfectly capable of hiking rates 100 basis points or more in less than a year. Or at least it used to be.)

The bear market that followed was the most significant anyone had seen since the early 1980s. High-flying tech stocks crashed, one after the other; and Bill Clinton’s move to release Human Genome Project data sent the biotechnology sector up in flames.

It was a painful time that no one who lived through it wishes to repeat — but Mark Yusko thinks we will repeat it, starting now.

In the 2000–2003 period, we had the tech bubble bursting, corporate scandals like Enron, the 9/11 attacks, and an honest-to-God, old-fashioned, job-killing recession.

I remember how everyone kept thinking at that time, “OK, this has been bad, but it’s over now.” But it wasn’t over.

After repeated fake-outs and final capitulation, we finally emerged from the muck (just in time to start an unsustainable housing bubble, but that’s another story).

One thing people forget is that we had a very accommodative Fed during that time. Greenspan pushed short rates up to 6.5% in September 2000. Just a year later, he had them down to 3% and ultimately to 1% in mid-2003.

That Fed was willing to move at light speed if they thought it necessary, unlike more recent regimes.

Parallel #2:  Negative corporate earnings

Another eerie parallel Mark noted was in corporate earnings.

We see that earnings peaked a few quarters ahead of each recessionary period then slid deeply into negative territory before recovering as the recession ended.

This time around we seem to be about halfway down to the trough. It’s entirely possible we are in a recession right now and don’t know it yet. The start date is discernible only in hindsight.

Parallel #3:  Margin debt growth

Margin debt is another bad sign.

Again, right now we appear to be in a place much like the early stages of the last two bear markets.

Parallel #4:  The presidential race

Finally, 2016 also marks the eighth year of the presidential cycle. The average stock return for the eighth year of all US presidential terms since 1901 is -14%. So if you liked 2000 and 2008, you should love the way 2016 ends (gulp).

Big opportunities lie ahead

In the equity markets, gains most often happen slowly, and losses usually happen quickly.

You can see this in the numbers, as the average bull market is much longer than the average bear market (more than five times longer at 97 months versus 18 months).

It’s critical, therefore, to always be looking for long opportunities, especially during the brief corrective periods (when things go on sale). You will soon have some excellent buying opportunities. Those with less foresight are going to dump some valuable assets, not because they want to but because they have no choice.

They’ll need the liquidity.

What should you buy? That’s not entirely clear yet, nor will we be able to catch the precise bottom. As they say, no one will ring a bell. But if Mark Yusko is right, the chance ought to arrive in the next year or so.

I could go on for another hundred pages sharing the new information we heard at SIC. I think you have a lot to chew on, though, plus some videos to watch and re-watch, so I’ll leave it there.

John Mauldin is the chairman of Mauldin Economics, which publishes a growing number of investing resources, including both free and paid publications aimed at helping investors do better in today's challenging economy.

© 2022 Newsmax Finance. All rights reserved.


JohnMauldin
At this year's Strategic Investment Conference, my good friend Mark Yusko poured cold water on whatever bullishly warm feelings the most optimistic folks may have clung to.
invest, fed, rates, 2000
803
2016-27-13
Monday, 13 June 2016 07:27 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 
Get Newsmax Text Alerts
TOP

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
NEWSMAX.COM
MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved